[cooper_ganglia]

From the article:

> Specifying an objective to the model is not enough. Directing how the work is constructed is what counts.

[ClikeX]

That still sounds incredibly vague and open for interpretation. For example, is setting up md files defining how you want things to be written enough?

[TurdF3rguson]

That's interesting but how is anyone supposed to prove it? They would have to get their hands on your prompts.

[archargelod]

Leaks, whistleblowers. Some circumstantial evidence will also do if there's enough of it. Like having hallucinated parts of code that do absolutely nothing, and can't be explained as e.g. leftovers from a refactor.

[swiftcoder]

> They would have to get their hands on your prompts

Unless you are running a local model, your prompts are almost certainly logged by your inference provider, and would only be a subpoena away?

[matheusmoreira]

And what exactly does it mean to "direct" how the work is constructed?

If I enter dark factory mode and go live my life while it churns tokens, then it's not copyrightable, but if I interact with it at every turn, then it is?