[_aavaa_]

> His argument(s) have evolved over time, but what of it? That just shows he's not the dogmatist the author wants him to be. Discourse evolves, get over it.

I disagree. It really reads as conclusion is fixed argument change as they are disproven.

[1attice]

Sometimes it takes any writer some time to tease out what's bothering them. Motivations are like navels, everyone has one, and often they are obscure and strange, even to the motivated.