[fc417fc802]

That's a meaningless argument of definition. Replace the language input and output with something else and it's no longer termed an LLM. It's like saying that a "human who writes with right hand" fundamentally requires his right hand in order to write anything because without it he is no longer a "human who writes with right hand" despite that he is still writing (now with his left hand).

[yladiz]

I’m not sure I follow. A language model fundamentally needs language to operate, and humans do not. Am I missing something from your point?