|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
45 days ago
|
|
> Any monopoly with viable economics for profit with no threat of competition yields monopoly profits "With viable economics" is the point. My "ludicrous statement" is a back-of-the-envelope test for whether an industry is nonsense. For comparison, consolidating all of the Pets.com competitors in the late 1990s would not have yielded a profitable company. |
|
Do you argue in good faith?
There’s a difference between being too early vs being nonsense.