[j-conn]

> ‘AI’ doesn’t exist, and LLMs have vanishingly narrow legitimate justifiable use cases. … I’m yet to identify any application of a LLM which can rationally be mistaken for intelligence.

What’s the opposite of AI psychosis? Burying your head in the sand? Because anyone who could write this unironically today is certainly afflicted.

[1ncorrect]

No one who is impressed by the current applications of LLMs should be in any way involved with making decisions which affect those not similarly cognitively impaired.

It’s no different to religions or economics.

[sirsau]

Hard to argue with you when disagreeing with your point makes me cognitively impaired.

[1ncorrect]

I always welcome, and look forward to, being proven wrong.