Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Noaidi 57 days ago
I am surprised at the push back on this. It is just science and it mentioned it in the article.

https://marathonhandbook.com/large-scale-marathon-study-iden...

I just said it needs an asterisk, not withholding anything. What if someone runs one second slower in higher humidity and temperature. Now that I would applaud.

3 comments

Why do you think the existing records weren't also set under good conditions?
> I just said it needs an asterisk, not withholding anything

It’s essentially the same as not setting the record. It would be qualified every single time it’s mentioned and be functionally saying “…so it doesn’t count.”

What was the temperature and humidity for the previous record? Or the rest of the top 10?