|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
55 days ago
|
|
I’ll agree the top of the stack may have compressed downwards. But that leaves open the possibilities that (a) the ceiling has risen and (b) the floor isn’t really moving, inasmuch as productively engaging with any tool required baseline intelligence. More pointedly, I don’t think anyone who opposes AI does so because they want to remain the smart kid in the room. > If there was nothing at stake, I wouldn't need to You’re on HN buddy. If you measure stakes by how pedantically you’re challenged, everything will rise to existential terms. |
|
It's more then being the smart kid in the room. The future is pointing to a place where programming is just a one hour tutorial on how to tell AI to do it for you. What happens to you if you're entire identity and career was built on being a programmer as many people are here? THAT is what is at stake.