|
|
|
|
|
by andai
56 days ago
|
|
Yeah, they don't even understand themselves (and this seems unlikely to change[0] but God knows), and how would you even get access to the enemy AGI's weights? And even if you did, wouldn't you need infinite computation to simulate every permutation of the neural net? (Your own, and the enemy's?) Also the whole thing implies a superintelligence would be perfectly rational, which is a pretty funny assumption. Relative to animals we are already superintelligent. How's that super-rationality going for us? xD A better frame here is replicators, I think. The thing that spreads doesn't have to be rational, or better quality or whatever. It just has to be better at spreading. That ends up looking less like Betamax, more like VHS, or less like Lisp and more like... JavaScript. Whatever the AGI equivalent of JavaScript would look like. [0] https://xkcd.com/1163/ |
|