[3form]

What are you asking about exactly? About classifying the project as feminist or the perceived feminist = artistic implication?

You start with this:

>I truly don’t understand what the hope to gain from self-classifying this is “feminist”.

To which I say - why not? Is this the problem?

[setr]

> To which I say - why not?

Because it creates weird, presumably unintentional implications. One such implication:

> They seem to imply that feminist = artistically produced, as opposed to professionally produced PCBs. So masculine = professional? But clearly that wasn’t their intention?

[foltik]

The article doesn’t say or imply that whatsoever.

That a feminist art project or collective has to be defined in opposition to something else is entirely your own framing.

This is where your mind goes when you read “feminist,” which reveals your priors.