|
|
|
|
|
|
by lee_ars
56 days ago
|
|
|
> So in your head, the analogy is not a big part of the argument? The analogy is decoupled from the thing it analogizes, and refuting the analogy refutes the thing itself about as much as burning a picture of the thing burns the thing itself. > The whole idea of comparing CSS to general purpose, Turing complete programming languages is surprisingly stupid. CSS has a very specific, narrow goal: styling HTML elements. Right, so, you still don't like the analogy but again don't address the argument. |
|
|