[shiandow]

Depends. I reckon a proof by an amateur would either be worthless because it demonstrates no understanding whatsoever or significantly better because they actually understand the proof.

LLM produced texts are often in a weird area where the quality of the content and the quality of the writing have very little to do with one another.

[FartyMcFarter]

I don't think it's true that all amateurs have no understanding whatsoever. Amateurs have proven things before, and they've also wasted mathematicians time with wrong proofs.

[shiandow]

I'm not saying none of them have any understanding, I'm saying the ones who understand would write better proofs.