They have a distinct commonality of nuclear research. As such, is the limitation in pattern recognition not yours? If you are overlooking it, you are suppressing it, and are a a part of the conspiracy.
From what I’ve looked up, the range is actually quite broad from astrophysics to aerospace to administrative roles.
Here are the individuals mentioned:
* Michael David Hicks (JPL, comets/asteroids research)
* Frank Maiwald (space research / JPL)
* Monica Reza (aerospace engineer, JPL)
* Nuno F.G. Loureiro (MIT, nuclear science and fusion)
* Carl Grillmair (Caltech astrophysicist)
* William Neil McCasland (Air Force, aerospace research)
* Melissa Casias (Los Alamos National Laboratory, administrative role)
* Anthony Chavez (Los Alamos, construction foreman)
I’m not sure what standard is being used to claim a meaningful connection here. The category seems extremely broad.
And the idea that “if you question it, you’re part of the conspiracy” is pretty convenient reasoning.
Honestly, I’d love to be part of some shadow organization secretly running the United States from behind the scenes — do you think they’re accepting applications?
Here are the individuals mentioned:
* Michael David Hicks (JPL, comets/asteroids research) * Frank Maiwald (space research / JPL) * Monica Reza (aerospace engineer, JPL) * Nuno F.G. Loureiro (MIT, nuclear science and fusion) * Carl Grillmair (Caltech astrophysicist) * William Neil McCasland (Air Force, aerospace research) * Melissa Casias (Los Alamos National Laboratory, administrative role) * Anthony Chavez (Los Alamos, construction foreman)
I’m not sure what standard is being used to claim a meaningful connection here. The category seems extremely broad.
And the idea that “if you question it, you’re part of the conspiracy” is pretty convenient reasoning.
Honestly, I’d love to be part of some shadow organization secretly running the United States from behind the scenes — do you think they’re accepting applications?