|
|
|
|
|
|
by ernesto905
48 days ago
|
|
|
From the administration's perspective, why was this a good idea? I'm scouring the web but I'm struggling to find a steel-man. My best guess is that this is to control where the research dollars go which I'll summarize below, but wondering if anyone has better ideas. From what I've read it seems the administration is very anti-social sciences, and very pro nuclear, AI, quantum. Thought from what I can tell most of the funding already goes to the hard sciences [1]. There were cuts proposed over the last few months but they were shut down by congress [2]. I suppose by cutting off the head of the org it's an easier fight to cut funding FY2027? [1]: https://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/all [2]: https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2026/04/nsf-lags-trump-proposes-... |
|
|