[y42]

I like the clean style, I was working on something similar, but never reached that readines-level.

However, the first screen seems a little contra productive. User entered a paragraph and in return gets a "summary" - but it feels so long. It's probably okay... it just triggered me very first impulse.

And what remains unclear is the meaning of "Team Sync". What's happening there? Is it a "group chat" or does it sends messages?

Speaking of... what about integrations with like Teams, Slack, Discord? I know that Teams offers a Meeting Summary which would be great if you could directly store it in _sig_.

[smadam9]

The screenshot feedback is fair. Updating it. The capture response should feel like "filed. here's where." not a report back at you. Working on it.

Team Sync isn't a group chat or a message sender. It's more like an approval step: you review what you've captured privately, decide what's actually worth sharing with your team, and publish that specific text to a shared knowledge base. Right now "publishing" means an abstracted git flow that pushes updates to a central Git repo on Github. Nothing goes to the team without you explicitly choosing it. The name could be clearer — that's useful feedback, thanks.

On integrations: Slack imports work today (you can pull exports into your context). Teams Meeting Summary is an interesting one. Right now you'd paste it in and Sig routes it. The summary gives you the factual scaffolding, then you add your layer on top. That's the part the transcript can't give you.