[jqpabc123]

Interesting from a technical perspective but with native RDP clients readily available on just about every platform, I don't see the need for it.

[le-mark]

When it’s in a browser you don’t need to install anything on the local machine. I used to use Apache guacamole to access my machine at home from work when I was stuck in a cube all day.

https://guacamole.apache.org/

[stephbook]

1 contributor, 1 commit, new project... gives me vibe-coding feels.

[zcw100]

If you have factual observations to make that's fine but can we stop with the "smells like vibe coding" attacks? It's like an AI version of an ad-hominem attack.

[pixel_popping]

Browsers are sandboxes, your native client often isn't, there is definitely a huge advantage, portability and embeddability as well, it's also simpler to sniff traffic (and MITM it).

[jqpabc123]

Doesn't this limit your ability to share resources and transfer data?

[pixel_popping]

Why would it? You have access to your entire filesystem via the browser.

[boredishBoi]

Not many good MFA options for native RDP/RDG. Putting it in the browser lets you wrap the whole thing with OAUTH/passkeys etc

[hnlmorg]

Having just implemented OAUTH into a Go app this week, I can assure you that it’s surprising easy to do so without making your entire application a website.

[boredishBoi]

I don’t disagree but none of the native RDP clients support oauth for non azure computers.

[tom_alexander]

Perhaps as a web client for the remote desktop on the BMC chips?