[latexr]

> So I asked Claude (…)

> I asked Claude (…)

> So I asked him (…)

> (…) so I asked Claude (…)

> (…) so I asked Claude (…)

> Thanks, Claude.

There doesn’t seem to be one bit of original research in the post, and no explanation of the data or conclusions. For example, what exactly does it mean that the papers “held up”, and how exactly did Claude reach that conclusion? If you don’t know, we can’t trust the data. If you do know, it should be in the post.

As it is, the post is almost devoid of information. Everything was “I asked Claude”. There’s no value here (aside from some saved tokens) above just crafting a prompt and saying “here, ask your favourite model this question”.

[dormento]

And it has a citation block at the bottom! Like anyone would want to cite this in a serious context.

This must be a troll.