|
|
|
|
|
by pixel_popping
59 days ago
|
|
I understand that powerful people build projects for political and control purposes, but I just don't care who manages a platform, do you care about who runs your OVH servers? Same way I don't care about the background of an artist behind a song. Could be a total dirtbag, I still don't care. I can despise someone while appreciating what they built or their prowess in a given field. Pretty sure you can find plenty of people throughout history whose accomplishments genuinely impressed you (and useful for humanity) while simultaneously thinking that same person belongs in prison. Projects are composed of many people. This idea that it's all "1 person" is nonsense. Companies that big are mostly ran by employees and leaders,not just the CEO sitting on top supervising and giving directives |
|
Yes? If they're from a sanctioned country then I could be held criminally liable or have my service interrupted without warning. I would not evaluate professional infrastructure if the owner refused to tell me where they were located.
> This idea that it's all "1 person" is nonsense.
It's the basis of how all C-suite operations work, do you need to see an org chart for a reminder? The idea that it's "all 1 person" is baked into the concept of private capital. Arrangements that give the employees or leadership executive priority is far, far in the minority of how businesses are ran today.