|
|
|
|
|
by john_strinlai
50 days ago
|
|
okay, so we now have: parent/homeowner responsible if someone drives home drunk, parent responsible if child gets drunk via abuse/neglect laws, and parent responsible for other crimes and damages caused by a child via dozens of individual laws. is that enough examples to satisfy your initial request? (which was a request for examples of the extremely broad statement: "We used to hold parents liable.") |
|
I know your point is talking about point 2, but I believe OPs comment was about point 1. But I also still don't know what the "used to" means in the original, do we not anymore?