|
|
|
|
|
|
by dbuxton
61 days ago
|
|
|
From the comments looks like lots of people looking at this problem from different angles. We (harriethq.com) also have a somewhat similar insight, which is that setting up connectors is a drag for non-technical users, and a lot of systems don't support per-user connectivity so need an API shim. The thing I like about this (Agent Vault) approach is that it's more extensible than what we're offering, which is a full managed service. But we've found that some features (e.g. ephemeral sandboxes to execute arbitrary e.g. uvx/npx based mcps) are just a big pain to self-deploy so it's easier for us to provide a service that just works out of the box. Kudos to the team, this looks great and I'm looking forward to playing with it |
|
|
The "connectors angle" is something we thought about as well and we built a whole product line around that called Agent Sentinel (I'll link that below). We weren't convinced, however, that enterprises were ready for this and instead took it back to our infra roots (Infisical is a security infra platform) and started simple with the problem: credential exfiltration. This thinking does lead to two different kinds of products though with one naturally becoming an infrastructure component; this makes much more sense for us at Infisical to work on.
https://infisical.com/docs/documentation/platform/agent-sent...