|
|
|
|
|
by throwaway2037
61 days ago
|
|
> Clojure was not a hiring barrier - it was a hiring filter.
It makes me think about this HN comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11933250 > Jane Street Capital's Yaron Minsky once said that contrary to popular belief hiring for OCaml developers was easier because the signal to noise ratio in the OCaml community is so much better than other, more approachable languages.
I saw a YouTube vidoe years ago that featured Yaron Minsky. He made similar points. In short, some programming languages are like catnip for excellent programmers. |
|
> Hence what, for lack of a better name, I'll call the Python paradox: if a company chooses to write its software in a comparatively esoteric language, they'll be able to hire better programmers, because they'll attract only those who cared enough to learn it.