|
|
|
|
|
by jmathai
4960 days ago
|
|
I understand your points. It's why we wanted to give free unlimited lifetime accounts instead of a free year or something else to monetize. > It's rather useless compared to actual help. Arguments against helping in ways that have specific impact (providing food, assisting with relocation, etc) are a straw man. It's not better to do nothing than something of small value. I have plenty of photo albums in my closet and if those somehow got lost or destroyed then I'd be devastated (more than any other physical object in my house). > If you're still charging them $.01 a year, that's still charging them something. You ought to fix that. Really? If we get more feedback like that then we're happy to change or give refunds. We're set up for subscriptions so it's the easiest way to do address verification. If a penny a year is too much, we'll gladly fix it. |
|
My argument isn't to do nothing - again, this looks like a nice gesture - but that you should do more. Maybe take all your earnings for a month and donate them to help the victims. You can evidently afford to give out almost-free accounts, can you do anything better?
> I have plenty of photo albums in my closet and if those somehow got lost or destroyed then I'd be devastated (more than any other physical object in my house).
Then scan them and throw them on Dropbox. Your service actively costs the victims money, Dropbox does not, so which helps more?
> Really? If we get more feedback like that then we're happy to change or give refunds. We're set up for subscriptions so it's the easiest way to do address verification. If a penny a year is too much, we'll gladly fix it.
These are people who are already financially strained by the hurricane. They may not even have a penny anymore. Did you consider this?