Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
cromka
64 days ago
It's a bit ironic that everyone considers Rust as safer while completely ignoring the heavily increased risk of pulling in malware in dependencies.
1 comments
pdimitar
63 days ago
Different things. "Rust is safer" generally means memory safety i.e. no double-free, no use-after-free, no buffer-/under-flows, and the like. The safety you seem to have in mind is "minimal dependency count".
link