Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nom 51 days ago
This is so unlikely to happen. There is a good chance that they are not as rare as we currently think, at least in that particular area.
4 comments

They are unique to like 2 lakes in Mexico. This is someone's pet that they dumped there. It would not have survived more than a week in Wales had it not been found.
There were more than 2 lakes but the specy is almost extinct so these areas are where you can still find some.
Well it's native to the Xochimilco "lake system". Sometimes its hard to say what's a different lake or not but it's the same system of lakes. They also used to be in Lake Chalco which at certain times of the year could connect into the same lake as Xochimilco. Regardless, it's always been a tiny range
My understanding is they were in other mountainous areas as well in central Mexico but their habitat was much more reduced there so they went extinct even faster.

one example: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382147531_Chronicle...

This paper is about the closely related Ambystoma velasci. The axolotl is Ambystoma mexicanum.

They are closely related enough that there's some evidence of hybridization but they are separate species. A. velasci is not endangered.

A. Velasci is definitely endangered in its natural habitats and it was also called Axolotl in nahuatl.

I don't think it is interesting to argue if there is one axolotl that is more important than the others, even if the one from Xochimilco has the particularity of staying in its larval state.

I think it likely speaks to how much more common they are as exotic pets than they have been in the past. That she found it before it died is surprising, and the longer I think about this story the longer I wonder if they just bought it as a pet and the river discovery was a gag for online clout.
why is your reply faded
That means it is downvoted
One in a million chances happen nine times out of ten.

Especially with 8 billion humans wandering around.