|
|
|
|
|
|
by LeFantome
63 days ago
|
|
|
Does “low level” translate to performance? Is Rust a “low level” language? Take C#. You can write a compiler in it that is very fast. It gives you explicit control over memory layout of data structures and of course total control over what you wrote to disk. It is certainly not “low level”. |
|
|
Some with structs, yes. But overall it doesn't give you much control over where things up in memory once references get involved compared to C, C++, or Rust.