|
|
|
|
|
by lucasfin000
63 days ago
|
|
This is definitely a fair concern, and something that we have thought thoroughly about, but let me clarify some things: Our architecture makes jurisdiction less relevant than it would be for a traditional email provider. All email content, subjects, attachments, contacts, etc are encrypted client-side, locally, before they reach our servers, and you hold the keys, not us. If we ever were to receive a legal request, we could only hand over encrypted blobs and routing metadata (sender/recipient addresses, timestamps), the same metadata any email provider in any country would have. We maintain a warrant canary at https://astermail.org/notices/canary.txt, and we have a full transparency report at https://astermail.org/transparency. We have never received a secret government subpoena, national security letter, or a gag order to date. |
|