[jqpabc123]

we know in few months/years this exact topic will be solved

You may know this somehow --- but I don't. Without a fundamental re-design, the basic problem will remain.

I don't believe it is possible to apply statistics to predict answers without significant errors.

[pixel_popping]

yes but most humans (also without tools, to do a fair comparison) also make significant errors, WAY more than Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.4 xhigh

[jqpabc123]

yes but most humans (also without tools, to do a fair comparison) also make significant error

Humans adopted the use of computers because they provided accurate answers at low cost.

At least until recently. Now, LLMs provide questionable answers at high cost.

[pixel_popping]

but LLMs + Tools (computers) right now beat large majority of humans (and we know this gap will keep widening), so how does that make them "not intelligent"?