Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Crestwave 49 days ago
Wouldn't strings(1) have worked for this?
1 comments

By default, strings needs a run of 4+ (printable|ascii) characters. This sounds like it was 1 ascii character at a time in a sea of random data (with other alpha chars removed).
Ah, right. It would have to be `strings -n 1`, then.