|
|
|
|
|
by mynameajeff
57 days ago
|
|
> lacks support for "new" features like C99 compatibility This made me laugh. It reminded me of course work I did in university that was clearly written many years before I took the course as it recommended we manually enable the "new" c99 standard in our compiler, which I guess survived in the documentation up through when I took the course, at which point it was still relevant since GCC was otherwise defaulting to C11 by the time I was using it. |
|