[fc417fc802]

> Instead of trying convince-by-assertion

TBF the idea that any and all fingerprinting falls under the umbrella of exploiting a vulnerability was also presented as an assertion. At least personally I think it's a rather absurd notion.

Certainly you can exploit what I would consider a vulnerability to obtain information useful for fingerprinting. But you can also assemble readily available information and I don't think that doing so is an exploit though in most cases it probably qualifies as an unfortunate oversight on the part of the software developer.

[SiempreViernes]

For the readers convenience I restated the argument also in my post, but if you look you can see it was also stated much earlier in the thread.

[UqWBcuFx6NV4r]

You haven’t made an actual argument. You’ve made a repeated assertion that you feel so religiously about that you simultaneously can’t justify it and get very abrasive when someone asks you to back it up.

[SiempreViernes]

Oh wow, do you really only write negative comments on others discussion? I defer to you much greater experience on being abrasive