[Dylan16807]

Everyone shows poor judgement in one area.

It sucks that he has those ideas, but he's a good writer.

[shimman]

He's a popular writer, but hardly good. No one is going to be reading his books in 50 years, let alone 200.

[falcor84]

That's an extremely high bar. But to the extent that critics and awards are the metric we have, he is an objectively good writer.

[shimman]

Oh course it's a high bar! Why should anyone care about this work outside of the time of their release? It's modern culture but it ain't gonna be passed down anytime soon.

[falcor84]

If the bar is that people will continue reading their books in 200 years, than which fiction writers of the last few decades would go into your list of "good"?

[shimman]

I don't know because you're asking me something that is impossible for a human that only lives to ~80 years.

Try asking better questions if you want better responses.

[Dylan16807]

Take your best guess, obviously. The question is fine.

You're already confidently predicting a negative future for Ender's Game, so you're clearly not adverse to predictions.

[alecbz]

I don't know that you can establish objectively if someone is a good writer. He's an acclaimed, award-winning writer, sure.

[peterfirefly]

The not-so-short story Ender's Game was great. The novel Ender's Game was awful. I hope someone told him it was too long, too repetitive, and too Gary Stu. I wish he had taken that feedback to heart.

[lamasery]

The novella is the only version I've read. I came away both not understanding why a longer, novel-length version would exist, and with no interest in reading anything even slightly worse than that from the same author (which I'm given to understand describes most of his other work).

The novella was an alright time, though.