Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Planktonne 55 days ago
That's still less thinking overall that someone who thought about all of that and thought about the scripting would have done.
1 comments

And even less than someone who wrote an interpreter for the script, less than someone who also chanted times tables while doing it.

More thinking isn’t a simple good thing. Given a limit to how much thought I can give any specific task, adding extra work may mean less where it’s most useful.

That's not a good-faith argument; obviously we're talking about relevant thought, rather than distraction (which, in context, would be less thought).
It is a good faith argument, my point is exactly that the actual scripting was not part of the relevant thought any more than the interpreter would have been.