[lokar]

Thus it always was. I’m old enough to remember when “if AI could beat a grandmaster at chess” was considered the finish line.

[sanex]

Over fitting to the benchmarks since 1996

[emp17344]

Well, yeah… turns out that goal wasn’t a good indicator for AGI, so we re-evaluated. That’s changing your hypothesis in the face of evidence, not “moving the goalposts” in the fallacious sense.

[Mistletoe]

What’s the indicator for AGI now? We are so far past the Turing Test it isn’t funny. In fact the models now are too intelligent, you would never think a human would have that much knowledge quickly about a subject you chose at random.