Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fuckinpuppers 58 days ago
Yes this is lawfare. They paid people to infiltrate. That’s exactly what going undercover is, and we don’t have any problems with that.

This is them applying a bias against an institution they don’t like by framing it as fraud and abuse (while they ransack the country at levels 100x larger)
1 comments
SV_BubbleTime 58 days ago
The issue is not paying people to infiltrate it is the fraud and money laundering. Did you read the indictment?
link
jauntywundrkind 58 days ago
It's from a bunch of useless known liars saying very little of substance & making lots of hot air. It's pretty unclear what the accusation really isal, amid all the grandstanding.

It sort of seems like they are saying: the SPLC didn't make it crystal clear what your money was going to and who we were paying, when. Some of it went to bad people. This is fraud.

On the contrary, I think many of the people funding SPLC are very happy about where there money is going. And it's clear why the SPLC can't tell you where exactly the money is going. Their work is so well known that the FBI has been (until the deplorables) paying them to do exactly this!

These people been and twist reality while saying nothing, while only obfuscating the truth. This case is the fraud.

link
SV_BubbleTime 57 days ago
Ok. 11 indictments in federal court for the hard crimes that typically require physical evidence of money, laundering, and wire fraud… yes that’s probably just from a bunch of use known liars, saying a little of substance.

So I guess that’s an answer that no you did not read the indictment?

link