[techblueberry]

Presumably they want to lose existing subscribers because it’s way too expensive to keep them at $20.

[Esophagus4]

Is it? I’m curious because I thought they were raising prices to pay for exorbitant training costs, not because subscribers are expensive on a unit basis.

I thought inference was cheap so there was little marginal cost of a new subscriber.

[dodobirdlord]

This was more or less true until everyone and their dog started running agents in a 24/7 busyloop as a bit.

[adastra22]

You’re not doing that on a $20/mo plan.