[_ache_]

I just installed calrs, a recent alternative to cal.diy. It absolutely rocks! The only downside is that it requires me to activate STARTTLS as force-TLS-SMTP isn't supported (I had to check the source code). It’s young, very promising, and honestly, I don't know what I could ask for more.

I also replaced Radical with rustical, and I gained free push updates.

https://cal.rs/ and https://github.com/lennart-k/rustical

And if you wanna try it out. https://cal.ache.one/u/ache

[preya2k]

Seems to be mostly vibe coded.

[hocuspocus]

It is vibe-coded by people from Vates, the company maintaining https://github.com/xcp-ng

Their internal IT infrastructure runs self-hosted OSS wherever possible. I don't think cal.rs is a toy project, they know the perils and headaches of doing open source.

[_ache_]

Yes, sadly. :(

[luckydata]

Who gives a shit. Cal.com is written by hand and the code is absolute garbage. Of all people that should be luddites I never imagined software engineers would be the most pointlessly staunch advocates of that philosophy.

[ramon156]

LLM-assisted is different from vibe-coded. Weird how you're so defensive about it, though

[elric]

You might want to look up what Luddism was all about. Hint: it's not about being anti-technology, but about fairness.

[liamgm]

sadly it's one of the strictly viral license AGPL , i prefer the more permisive one

[nextaccountic]

people are claiming cal.com did a bait and switch

AGPL (specially if you take external contributions) is the one license where one can't do a bait and switch

If anything, if people are concerned about companies doing a 180 on open source, they should demand more AGPL, not less