[socalgal2]

I had a big feature I was working on. jj made it easy to split it into 21 small commits so I could give reviewers smaller things to review while I continued to work. It wasn't perfect and maybe git can do it all by itself but it's not my experience.

In other words, I effectively was working on one thing, but at a quicker easier pace.

[conradludgate]

I've been doing this in git for years. Interactive rebasing isn't that scary. At work we have a very big stacked PR culture on github using native git

[tinodb]

But in general you are one of the few that does. Many devs do find git rebases scary. Having done it in both I can say with JJ it is much much simpler (especially with jjui).

[rstuart4133]

> I've been doing this in git for years.

You've missed a crucial detail.

You've both been doing it, but only one of you was using a tool that needed rebases to pull it off.