[Freak_NL]

This whole idea is dead on arrival because of this.

Most nations actively warn their citizens never to carry packages from someone you don't know, and never to carry packages you didn't pack (or saw opened) yourself even for people you do know. And still people agree to carry sealed packages for someone they had a few nice nights with on holiday before boarding the plane back home. That tends to end in a little room on the same airport with security/police grilling you before sending you on to the judicial system where the tough-on-drugs judge will sentence you to a couple of years of extra holiday. In a cell with rats.

There is no way to clear this legally and ethically.

[dpark]

Even across state lines is a big risk but carrying unknown packages into another country is astronomically stupid. You don’t get to play the “I didn’t realize” card, either, when you lie to a customs agent and claim you didn’t accept packages from anyone else.

[bombcar]

Even just going to the Apple Store when you're in NYC for someone and bringing back a brand new Mac can get customs officials interested.

I'd be hesitant taking anything from anyone, even a child handing a letter to be postmarked in Florida.

[rescbr]

Yeah, but bringing back a brand new Mac that I personally bought at an Apple Store for a friend won’t ever land me in jail - worst case scenario is that the friend would have to pay me back for whatever import duties the customs officials levy on the computer.

Now, carrying a random package from somebody on the Internet? There are more productive ways to get into jail than this!

[TZubiri]

Isn't this fixed by:

A: unpacking and inspecting the packages? B: The company assuming the risk and liability. C: The company collecting evidence through KYC and cooperating in the case of crime?

Probably too much hassle to save some bucks when compared to a courier service, though.

[dpark]

A. Maybe. Are you going to ship with someone who is going to open your package and rifle through it, though? I would personally also not feel confident in my ability to check fully for hidden illicit material if I were the courier.

B. No. Absent laws indemnifying the courier, a company saying “I’ll take the heat for those drugs you’re carrying” is not a meaningful act.

C. No. This seems like more of B.

This is all surmountable if the laws allow it. I assume FedEx drivers don’t go to jail of a package unknowingly contains drugs. But I don’t know what needs to be in place for random Joe to be acting as a casual courier without taking on legal liability.

[georgefrowny]

Also if you can get away with it, all drug traffickers would soon have an online order for their package so if stopped they can just say they're an innocent courier.

[TZubiri]

From a security engineering risk I don't think that would be an issue, because the same mechanism that catches malicious senders would be at play, the sender would have to identify through the app, with a payment provider and to the courier to send a package. The fake courier would have to sign up as a fake sender and be risk-exposed through the sender role.

Courier immunity does not confer much advantage compared to just signing up and having someone else send it. Except, it's true, that a trafficker could play both roles and self serve to avoid courier inspection/risk, there's some implications there for sure, but same as any job right? Pizza delivery guy could be selling drugs. It's not like transport is a niche job that might warrant specialized training and certification, it's like half the economy, tell me a commodity more central to business than oil, it can happen yes, but it isn't the end of the world if it happens on your business it's part of the trade, as long as you can deal with it, comply with the investigation, put preventive measures, and design the system with that in mind, I think it'd be ok.

Obligatory disclaimer. I am not a lawyer, this is not legal advice, just my personsal opinion on the matter

[morkalork]

Recently:

https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/article/exclusive-canadian-tee...

>Jade’s Instagram account suggests she thought she had been hired for a legitimate job as an “international package shipper,” with a salary of $5,000 per trip.

Her recruiter texted her: “We pay your flights, accommodation, food.”

[JackFr]

And yet I know there used to be a business (when the Concorde was flying), where they would offer very cheap tickets on the Concorde from New York to London and back, the hitch being that you agreed to take no luggage, and your luggage allowance was taken up by the brokering company, who provided a rush courier service largely for legal/business documents and the like.

I guess this company is slightly different, I think it could be made legal.