[harvey9]

I can still see a path where the manager was stupid but not malicious. The manager sent on a document which he was too lazy to check at least had the right endpoints but left the GP's contact details on. I could also imagine intentional harm to GP's reputation was the goal, with really clumsy execution.

[antisthenes]

Either way, that person should not be managing anything.

And if it was an honest mistake, they need to come out and apologize both to the IC and to the team that is using the documentation.

[slava_]

I think it says a lot about micromanaging practice broadly. the person assigned for a task should be fully trusted and accountable. the manager could've criticize writing, recommend using LLM, but not interfere. what they've done shows lack of trust and responsibility first.

[plumbees]

Many mangers shouldn't be managing anything.