|
|
|
|
|
|
by diavelguru
62 days ago
|
|
|
Having used Claude Code at work and for personal projects these past 8 months, I can see the attraction to keep going till your session cap is hit. I've used Claude for professional work coding, unit testing, personal projects in languages I haven't learned; completed work I had on the back burner for a number of years. I learned early on to take time for myself and this is no different. One must get out and run, swim, bike, weights, whatever but get your mind out of the computer and work and do some human necessary things besides just eating, pooping and sleeping. We need time to bond with our loved ones, parents, siblings and yes even coworkers. Until we as individuals take that time and leave the obsession (for a while), yes we will spend more and more time getting things done with AI. It's like any addiction. The dopamine hit is very powerful and we do need to reset our mind and rest and form long term memories as well as what my mom always said (take time to smell the roses). |
|
|
Really resonates — and you've identified something important. The personal discipline piece is real. What our data is showing though is there's also an organisational layer on top of it. AI pressure to do more has emerged as a top 4 burnout driver in 2026 — engineers aren't just choosing to keep going, many are feeling the expectation from managers that AI tools mean they should ship more. The dopamine loop you describe and the external expectation compound each other. It's hard to step away when the system around you treats your AI-assisted velocity as the new baseline. If you want to add your data to the survey: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdu-1Sa6oPvhDtFtBuK...