[gordian-mind]

I was suspicious of those random game developers getting quoted, and this is the pinned post of the one giving this cute silly story about slowing down game speed time:

"Announcing TORMENT HEXUS, a match-3 roguelike about putting technofascist CEOs on the wrong side of skyscraper windows!

[...]

And remember: they SHOULD be afraid of us. #indiedev #indiegame"

Weird times.

[qwery]

I'm not sure if you're saying that your suspicions were valid or not. Suspicious of what, exactly?

Like, yes, the most likely people to respond to such a call for "stuff to put in an article on Kotaku" are probably developers that want some publicity. But this is hardly surprising.

[delusional]

Eh, I remember the myriad of both "Torture Bin Laden" as well as "Torture George Bush" flash games in the early/mid 2000s. I think it's very on brand for indie developers.

[gordian-mind]

I don't believe those are the same thing. Many people lately seem just frankly enthusiastic about political murders.

[cubefox]

Bluesky has a lot of left-wing extremists where things like murdering CEOs is cool because they are allegedly "technofascist".

[esrauch]

"Evil megacorp" media is hardly new.

[cubefox]

Murdering CEOs is extremism, saying something is an "evil megacorp" is totally different.

[jodrellblank]

There's probably something eloquent by Hannah Arendt about how 190,000 Americans killed by health insurance companies goes unnoticed while one person killing a CEO becomes a spectre of "left wing extremism" held up as an example.

Or was it by The Joker from Batman?

Or was it when protesters in Latin America sat down blocking a road to protest environmental destruction and an American driver was so angry that he was mildly inconvenienced that he got out of his car and murdered one of them with his gun. And Joe Rogan's podcast commentary was "what did they expect?", more annoyed at the inconvenience to drivers than the murder of a human.

Or maybe when Just Stop Oil protestors threw soup and mashed potato on the glass in front of a painting, with the idea "look how angry you are at the damage to a valuable and irreplacable object, this is how angry you should be at the damage to the valuable and irreplacable environment which keeps all humans alive" and Fox News laughed at them for both damaging something important and not causing any real damage so they were ineffective. Then the judge gave them 2 years in prison on the grounds that throwing a can of soup at someone's face would be violence, so throwing it at a painting is violence. But no oil executives overseeing the Exxon Valdez disaster or the Gulf of Mexico disaster faced any jail time at all.

Or when the suffragette movement cut a painting of Venus de Milo to protest against Emmeline Pankhurst being arrested and rough-handled, and people were angrier about the harm to the painting of a woman than about the harm to a real woman.

Or when Fox News says "they aren't protesting the right way" so Kapaernik asked actual verterans how to peacefully protest respectfully and they told him to kneel during the national anthem, and the complainers didn't care a whit and said that was still the wrong way and disrespectable, and he lost his job and the president tweeted rude things about him personally, and the national football thingy made that kind of protest forbidden, almost as if the objection "protesting the wrong way" was all bullshit.

Yes, probably Hannnah Arendt could put it eloquently.

But you're right, murder is wrong, and that's all there is to it.

[cubefox]

> There's probably something eloquent by Hannah Arendt about how 190,000 Americans killed by health insurance companies

Health insurance companies don't kill people, quite the opposite. If it weren't for health insurance, a lot more people would die. Murdering their CEOs is crazy extremism.

[jodrellblank]

Physicians For A National Health Program put the figure at 200,000 people annually[1]. What's your source for saying the number is zero? When they deny claims, people die. When they override medical doctor recommendations and insist on cheaper treatments, people die. When they tangle up customers with paperwork and bureaucracy, that some people can't access the health insurance they pay for. When they take money out of the system as profit, that money isn't helping the sick. When United Healthcare spends $12M/year on lobbying[1] it isn't doing that to improve patient care.

> Murdering their CEOs is crazy extremism.

When a system doesn't have a pressure release valve, the pressure doesn't go away. When a system blocks or ignores peaceful protest, the pressure doesn't go away. The thread running through my comment is that harming humans is wrong, yes murder is wrong - but sticking a label on it and saying "leftist extremism" and then denying real issues is not helping. The system needs ways to hear people saying "things aren't fine" before those people go crazy extremist, not after.

[1] https://pnhp.org/news/estimated-us-deaths-associated-with-he...

[2] https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/industries/summ...

[gordian-mind]

Name-dropping Hannah Arendt does not rescue this from being an elaborate equivocation about murder.

[dwroberts]

Log off and go watch Robocop, jesus