[fluffybucktsnek]

> ECS is an abstract term for a data structure.

Sources? I have cited mine for why it isn't.

[CyberDildonics]

You want a source for saying an ecs can be implemented as a class? It's all over github.

[fluffybucktsnek]

Then, surely, you should be able to find a link to a ECS class's source easily. So where is it?

Also, remember, it's not my responsibility to search to prove your arguments. Burden of proof is on the claimant, as it goes.

[CyberDildonics]

https://jslee02.github.io/awesome-entity-component-system/

[fluffybucktsnek]

Funny, there are no classes named "ECS" in that link. In fact, there are no classes at all, because you didn't actually link a class source. Why push the step of searching for the class towards the reader when you could do it yourself? Wasn't it easy? I wonder why?

Taking a cursory look (which is already beyond my responsibilities) at https://github.com/redxdev/ECS/blob/master/ECS.h, by searching "class ECS" and "struct ECS" and "EntityComponentSystem" wields no results.

[CyberDildonics]

They're ecs, some of them are wrapped in classes. Classes are just a simple programming structure. You should probably learn how to program before arguing all this stuff.

[fluffybucktsnek]

>They're ecs, some of them wrapped in classes.

No, they aren't.

> You should probably learn how to program before arguing all this stuff.

Notice how I didn't reveal whether I program or not, yet you still made assumptions about it. I suspect that you either are a poor programmer or a troll.