|
|
|
|
|
by ggreer
57 days ago
|
|
> Tesla doesn't even have the permits to operate Robotaxis in California and probably never will because they are actually stricter vs Texas. I'd like to note that in just a few months, the goalposts have moved from "Tesla will never get rid of their safety drivers in their Robotaxis" to "Tesla will never operate Robotaxis in California." As before, would you like to bet on your prediction? I'm willing to wager you any amount up to $1,000 that before the end of 2028, Tesla will have Robotaxis in California, available to the public, without a safety driver. Note that this may not require a permit for deployment, just driverless testing, as that is how Waymo currently operates.[1] December 31st, 2028 may seem like a long ways off, but it's much sooner than never. 1. https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/auto... |
|
They didn't though, they just moved them to a chase car. Because Elon Musk is an incredibly successful con artist. Why isn't every robotaxi driverless and open to the public like Waymo is? Tesla is so far behind Waymo it is laughable.
https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/musk-t...
Tesla touts California robotaxis but does nothing to get permits
Documenting driverless testing miles is critical for a series of permits
Tesla logged zero miles last year in California for the sixth straight year
Waymo documented 13 million miles over a decade before securing driverless ride-hailing permit