|
|
|
|
|
|
by Yukonv
57 days ago
|
|
|
Some broad assumptions are being made that plans give you a precise equivalent to API cost. This is not the case with reverse engineering plan usage showing cached input is free [0]. If you re-run the math removing cached input the usage cost is ~5-34% more. Was the token plan budget increase [1] proportional to account for this? Can’t say with certainty. Those paying API costs though the price hike is real. [0] https://she-llac.com/claude-limits [1] https://xcancel.com/bcherny/status/2044839936235553167 |
|
|