Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by alex43578 58 days ago
Yes, it’s much better to spend “$400,000 for a Research Project on Whether Ducks Enjoy Classical Music”, just to ensure not a single grant went unfulfilled.

We have a $1.78T deficit. The ducks and the mathematicians will need to take a cut at this point.
3 comments
rrr_oh_man 58 days ago
> We have a $1.78T deficit

The fatal assumptions many people thinking about government spending from the outside make are that

a) money is limited

and

b) money is redistributed (~to a cause of their choice) after funding for something else gets cut

link
alex43578 58 days ago
Money isn’t limited, as in we can just print more, but it comes at an inflationary cost: see the last 5 years. MMT doesn’t work.

Since money is limited, and we’re spending in a deficit, money shouldn’t be redistributed to another bad cause after something gets cut. Unfortunately, and all too often, it does.

One side cuts taxes to spend on blowing up the world’s energy market, another side raises taxes to buy votes among the people who pay 0 in taxes (or fund a study on if ducks like Mozart). They’re both wrong, and people are too blinded by the sports-team nature of politics to recognize this.

link
whatever1 58 days ago
If the economy still has a pulse today it’s because of math. Literally linear algebra is what drives LLMs.

On the question on music and ducks, music seems something that humans universally get, but it is not clear if animals do so. Why we should not research it? What if music is the secret to human consciousness?

link
werrett 58 days ago
Yes, let’s pay down the deficit by cutting funding to the sciences. While the latest war is running at ~1 billion a day (we’re in day 48 btw).

https://iran-cost-ticker.com/

link
alex43578 58 days ago
Cut the duck study and avoid blowing up the world’s energy markets for $1B a day. Nowhere in my comment did I argue for another trip to the sandbox.

The US had a balanced budget as little as 30 years ago. This current state of fiscal profligacy isn’t inevitable, except for the fact that both parties realized they could buy votes with your children’s financial wellbeing.

link