Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by yjftsjthsd-h 58 days ago
That doesn't make sense. Why would llama.cpp need to move any faster than ollama? For that matter, why not have a llama.cpp package and llama.cpp-git in the AUR?
1 comments
rf15 58 days ago
what are you talking about? llama.cpp doesn't need to respect ollamas speed at all. It does not depend on it, it's the opposite of that.
link
yjftsjthsd-h 58 days ago
The claim was that llama.cpp moves too fast to be in Arch's normal repos. But Arch does package ollama. Therefore, either 1. ollama somehow avoids the need to move fast, or 2. it moves at an acceptable pace when packaged.

Edit: Or perhaps put differently: If ollama includes a copy of llama.cpp and has a non-AUR package, why can't there be a non-AUR package that's just llama.cpp without ollama?

link