|
|
|
|
|
|
by jorvi
63 days ago
|
|
|
That seems very unlikely. Chinese AI vendors specifically pointed out that even a few gens ago there was maybe 5-15% more capability to squeeze out via training, but that the cost for this is extremely prohibitive and only US vendors have the capex to have enough compute for both inference and that level of training. I'd take their word over someone that has a vested interested in pushing Anthropic's latest and greatest. The real improvements are going to be in tooling and harnessing. |
|
|
I don't have any special knowledge here, but the guy in the podcast (who worked/works with one of the big AI firms) is the one who made the claim. In the future when (if?) the speed of development slows I agree it would no longer be true