[user3939382]

This is actually a great criticism. Post Enlightenment we’ve come to worship the written word as a source of truth. It’s not. Thoughts, wisdom, understanding, exist primarily (and by necessity primarily) as a continuous structure in our minds. By writing, we distill and collapse this rich continuous structure into a discrete 2D slice. It’s portable which has many benefits but we tend to forget that this written word we worship in academia is a low fidelity copy created out of necessity, not because it’s optimal. In fact, much is lost this way. The hazard is that we often end up testing for mastery of this low fidelity discretization rather than the knowledge structure it shadows.

[layer8]

On the other hand, books allow us to access a much broader selection of ideas than would otherwise be feasible.

I’m not sure where LLMs lie on that spectrum. They allow faster access, but it also feels more limited.

[DangitBobby]

We would literally not have access to this criticism without the written word. It would have long been lost to time. And so it is with enumerate other thoughts that happily have been recorded.

Before written word, the uneducated had to just take the words of the (apparently) wise as an authority on all matters, and the only access to their knowledge was through conversation with them. That's gatekeeping and siloing in one go.

And authorities' thoughts themselves often form 2D slices of knowledge once they stop continually updating themselves in the know on SotA. Even if they do keep themselves updated, each conversation you've had with (what a layperson can recollect of it) is a thin 2D slice of that knowledge.

I can think of practically no ways that written expertise is not better.

[palmotea]

> We would literally not have access to this criticism without the written word. It would have long been lost to time. And so it is with enumerate other thoughts that happily have been recorded.

No. Without the written word, this criticism would not have even existed. There would have been no point to make it. Who criticizes something that doesn't exist?

[DangitBobby]

Or very likely any of the insights dreamed up by Socrates, was the very, very obvious point. I'm sure that gotcha felt really nice though.