|
|
|
|
|
by raw_anon_1111
57 days ago
|
|
So my point is invalid that you shouldn’t depend on government funding of media because if the government doesn’t like what you say they will remove funding when that’s exactly what they did? But I think the hard on for PBS that conservatives have is that PBS admitted gay people exist. Back in the 60s PBS was controversial partially because it showed black and white kids playing together on Sesane Street… |
|
Press that does not need to be profitable is extremely valuable to a democracy as it can openly talk about any issues without a conflict of interest.
Good democracies have that funding and no meddling of politicians with the content enshrined in their constitution.