[varispeed]

This is deranged. Say you wanted to use AI to prepare whistleblowing submission to use regulatory language and test for any weak points. Then Claude flags it and requires you to identify yourself. It's not a stretch of imagination that before you manage to send the bundle, you find yourself in the suitcase somewhere in the woods. People explore all kinds of sensitive stuff and I see it is tempting for AI companies to see exact person behind it and then it takes one disgruntled employee to put lives in danger. WTF

[Kim_Bruning]

I think minimal opsec here would suggest you not share your data with a random corporation in the usa.

[HWR_14]

Sharing the data with any random corporation seems like a bad idea.

[duskdozer]

>Say you wanted to use AI to prepare whistleblowing submission to use regulatory language and test for any weak points.

Why would you do this? If you can't write it yourself, you're just sabotaging your effort once the hallucinations are revealed. Secondly, a whistleblower is going to use a corporate LLM provider? Even without ID checks, that's an extremely uncompensated risk.