[lelanthran]

>> It's AI attackers vs AI + Human defenders.

> Why would a human then be in a position to defend better than an AI when an AI is in a better position to attack than a human?

I did not make the claim that humans are in a better position to defend.

[AlecSchueler]

> There are still protections and mitigations that targets can do, but those things require humans.

You claimed that there are certain protections and mitigations (i.e. defence moves) which require humans (ergo humans do these things better than AI, necessitating an AI+human team).

But you've still avoided expanding on what they might be, preferring instead to make petty remarks about my imaginative abilities.

[lelanthran]

> You claimed that there are certain protections and mitigations (i.e. defence moves) which require humans (ergo humans do these things better than AI, necessitating an AI+human team).

Right, but I did not make the claim that humans are better than AIs.